pro act

A bill that provides protections for workers trying to organize has passed in the House. During an interview on ‘Stinchfield,’ Dick Morris, political strategist, said the move could “destroy the gig economy and unionize America.” Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021, or the PRO Act, is House Resolution 842 and passed on March 9. The bill passed 225-206, with only five Republicans in favor. The bill is unlikely to advance in the Senate with a lack of Republican support. Both sides are definitely in disagreement about how the bill will affect America. 

Reactions to the PRO act

During ‘Stinchfield,’ Morris said, “it’s horrible; it will completely change the whole American economy and change the way 40 million people do their work, it’s part of an effort to unionize all of America.” Union leaders say the Protecting the Right to Organize Act would begin to protect them from what they believe is unfair big business and management, making union organizing drives and elections difficult. Morris pointed out federal funds used for construction require the use of unionized workers. He called it “part of the Democrats’ playbook, like the guise of COVID-19 was used to unconstitutionally change voting in the 2020 presidential election.” The bill has rapidly gained support from left and socialist groups. The Democratic Socialists of America launched a national campaign in support of the bill on twitter. The National Retail Federation called the Protecting the Right to Organize Act the “worst bill in congress,” for these ten reasons.

1. Puts an end to independent work and the gig economy

Under the PRO Act, the gig is up! One provision has the potential to completely upend business models that allow individuals to work independently. The PRO Act would codify California’s controversial “ABC test” for classifying workers as either employees or independent contractors. That test severely limits opportunities for individuals to pursue independent work and has resulted in job losses in California. Expanding it nationwide would mean limited opportunity for individuals to work as independent contractors in numerous industries, including those who drive for ridesharing platforms such as Uber and Lyft and those who provide important services to retailers.

2. Say goodbye to private ballots

In a world where the PRO Act is law, workers would be stripped of many privacy rights they currently have, including the right to cast a secret ballot in union elections. The PRO Act would replace this hallmark of democratic elections with “card check,” a scheme where employees are forced to publicly cast their votes and are subject to union coercion and intimidation.

pro act bill

3. No more employee privacy

The PRO Act would force employers to turn over employees’ personal information – including cell phone numbers, emails and home addresses – to union organizers in advance of a union election without the opportunity for employees to provide consent or opt out. What could go wrong here? Workers and their families could be subject to union harassment and intimidation tactics if this provision becomes law.

4. Same goes for free choice

Twenty-seven states have chosen to adopt right-to-work laws that give employees the free choice to decide whether to join a union without risking their jobs. The PRO Act would override the will of the voters in those states, depriving workers of the freedom to decide for themselves and forcing them to pay union dues.

5. Picketing and union coercion coming to Main Street

In one of the most shocking provisions, the PRO Act would permit unions to strike or boycott neutral third parties that are not directly involved in an underlying labor dispute. This means a small business that simply does business with a company tied up in a labor dispute with a union would be vulnerable to picketing and boycotting by union organizers. These “secondary boycotts” cause economic damage to neutral small businesses and have the potential to do irreparable harm to their reputations in their local communities.

6. More government control over private contracts

As if the government doesn’t already have its hand in everything, the PRO Act would eliminate the freedom of employers and employees to negotiate the terms of a contract if a bargaining agreement is not reached within the first 120 days of negotiation. Instead, the PRO Act would require an arbitrator who has no familiarity with the business’s operations to set binding contract terms. This sort of government control has bankrupted many municipalities and fueled the public sector pension crisis.

7. Limitless joint employer liability

The PRO Act would codify an expansive “joint employer” standard, meaning retailers could suddenly face liability for workplaces they do not control and workers they do not employ. This expanded joint employer standard (which determines when a company can be considered a “joint employer” with its contractors or franchisees) has been opposed on a bipartisan basis, given the severe threat it poses to our country’s small and local businesses.

8. Jeopardizes attorney-client privilege

The PRO Act would resurrect the so-called “persuader rule,” which interferes with attorney-client confidentiality and would make it harder for businesses, particularly small businesses, to secure legal advice on complex labor law matters.

socialist pro act

9. Increases costly litigation for all parties

Buckle up for costly lawsuits! The PRO Act would increase costly class-action lawsuits that directly benefit trial lawyers at the expense of employees and employers by prohibiting mandatory arbitration of employment disputes.

10. Interferes with retailers’ ability to run their businesses

The PRO Act would take away the ability of employers to keep their workplaces open during economic strikes, which could cripple their business.

Most Republicans seem to agree the PRO Act is one of the worst bills in Congress. It is designed to strengthen labor unions and force workers into paying union dues. Many of the provisions have been proposed to Congress and the courts in the past but were rejected. “It’s all a device to unionize the country, legitimize them, force them onto a payroll, and then force them into a union,” Morris concluded in the interview. What will happen to all of the free-lancers and independent workers who choose that lifestyle? People who want to make their own schedule and truly be their own boss will no longer have that option because their jobs will be eliminated. 

Written by: Erinn Malloy

Social sharing: